A private equity fund acquired and merged two equipment manufacturing companies to increase operational efficiencies. Within six months, the private equity fund discovered that a significant revenue growth opportunity had been overlooked. One company was better positioned to focus on automated mass-market products, while the other had a competitive advantage in high-end, customized solutions. Thus, completed tasks such as creating sales teams, developing quoting processes and setting up back-end technology required revision to capitalize on the opportunity to stake out different positions in the market.
This example illustrates a common pitfall in deal execution: the underappreciation of commercial and strategic differentiation that can fuel long-term value creation. Successful M&A transactions go beyond cost synergies. They require a clear understanding of each entity’s unique market positioning and growth levers from the outset.
At the onset of a deal, the focus is predominantly on growth and increasing profitability. However, as integration progresses, leadership teams become preoccupied with merging operations. This leaves little time to convene and establish clear customer-facing strategies to achieve the intended deal value.
KPMG research indicates that 70% of deals fail to create true accretive value for shareholders. One of the reasons being that, amid all the organizational churn that occurs through integrations, operating leaders of the business lose focus on top-line value creation. This is especially true in cases of mergers between organizations of comparable size, or acquisitions requiring significant changes, where it is essential to build momentum around a completely new strategic plan for the integrated business. This seems intuitive but can often get lost when teams get locked in on day-to-day priorities to integrate and run the business.