Skip to main content

      A growing number of companies are taking into account the significant opportunities and risks posed by sustainability issues in their corporate strategy. How consistently the strategy is implemented in general, and also in relation to sustainability in day-to-day operations, is closely linked to a comprehensive and effective governance approach. Among other things, remuneration-related incentives play a key role in this approach.

      On the one hand, the board of directors sets the strategic course for sustainability and, on the other hand, should contribute to ensuring that this course is adhered to in its daily decisions. Anchoring the key strategic goals in the remuneration of the board of directors and, where applicable, also of senior executives can be an effective incentive to stay on course. This applies to a company's key economic goals as well as its sustainability goals.  

      Integration of sustainability criteria into executive board remuneration

      The system of executive board remuneration is an important aspect of corporate governance for a company's shareholders. For the English-language report ‘Incentivising long-term value creation’, data from 375 listed companies in 15 countries was evaluated and examined to determine the extent to which sustainability criteria are already integrated into executive remuneration. The remarkable result: this is already the case for an impressive 78 per cent of these companies. 

      Further results of the study at a glance

      • 88 per cent of companies that link the remuneration of their board members to sustainability targets align these with ESG issues that are relevant to their business. These vary greatly from country to country.
      • The ESG targets that are incorporated into executive remuneration most frequently relate to climate change, for example reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and to the company's own workforce: employee engagement, proportion of female executives, accident rate.
      • Of the 274 companies that measure the performance of their executive board based on sustainability-related targets and provide information on how these are incorporated into variable remuneration, 37 per cent include ESG targets in both short-term and long-term incentives.  Twenty-three per cent include such targets only in long-term incentives, and the remaining 40 per cent use them exclusively in short-term incentives. 

      Recommended actions

      How to integrate sustainability indicators into executive board remuneration:

      Select key sustainability indicators that are relevant and appropriate for remuneration and closely linked to the company's strategy. The indicators should help steer the company in the intended strategic direction.

      Focus remuneration on a few suitable sustainability indicators that are crucial to business success. Suitable indicators should be controllable, measurable at intervals shorter than one year, and part of a continuous reporting system for senior management.

      Determine the relative share of sustainability-related targets in the short- and long-term variable remuneration components and define the target group for which the targets are designed. This report focuses on the remuneration of the board of directors – however, the performance indicators relevant to this target group can also be taken into account in an adapted form in the remuneration of top executives.

      Information about financial incentives for the executive board is a key assessment criterion, particularly for the capital market. For this reason, public reporting on executive board remuneration is required by law for listed companies in many countries. The reliability of remuneration-related sustainability indicators is often ensured by external audits.

      Our report, ‘Incentivising long-term value creation’, which you can download now, is intended to serve as both inspiration and a basis for dialogue with stakeholders.

      Methodology

      The companies whose data was analysed for this study are the 25 largest companies based on market capitalisation in June 2024 from each of the following 15 countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. The study was conducted in July and August 2024.

      The data analysed comes exclusively from publicly available information: the 2023 annual reports and, where necessary, the remuneration reports, sustainability reports and websites of the companies.

      auto_stories

      Um Anreize für eine langfristige Wertschöpfung zu schaffen, sollten Unternehmen ihre Nachhaltigkeitsziele in der Vorstandvergütung verankern. Unser Bericht zeigt, wie dies in der Praxis bereits umgesetzt wird.




      More KPMG insights

      Your contact

      Nadine-Lan Hönighaus

      Partner, Audit, Regulatory Advisory, Sustainability Reporting & Governance; Global Solution Lead ESG Governance

      KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft