We have a responsibility to take action. The global concern regarding climate change has captured the attention of governments, the media, the public, and – quite notably – the younger generation.
The UK’s climate obligations under the Paris Climate Agreement were formally extended to Jersey in 2022, in response to the island’s Carbon Neutral Roadmap. This means Jersey’s emissions are now linked to the wider climate targets of the UK.
But the question remains, “how does this impact Jersey’s financial sector?”.
While the financial sector doesn’t first appear to be a ‘high emitter’, with over £1 trillion in assets administered through Jersey, the capital it deploys can play a key role in supporting the decarbonisation of the global climate targets. What’s more, the Paris Climate Agreement sets an expectation that countries will align financial flows with global net-zero efforts.
That’s why it is essential within the island’s large financial sector for private equity firms, asset managers, banks, and businesses alike to pay particular attention to where money is being invested / loaned. And the environmental impact those investments may have, as those financed emissions contribute a substantial amount to Jersey’s wider climate impact.
Much of the narrative around ESG investing is that one must sacrifice financial returns for environmental or social benefit. In reality, that isn’t necessarily true.
Recent studies have shown that when ESG funds are compared against more traditional investments, companies can achieve substantially lower financed emissions with little to no impact on returns and financial risk compared to industry benchmarks.
Other studies, such as one conducted by the IEEFS, reveal the performance of ESG funds has either matched or surpassed traditional funds. ESG funds returned an average of 12.6% in 2023 compared to 8.6% for traditional funds.
If financial returns experience little to no impact and have been proven to at least maintain their value, it could be argued financial actors have a responsibility – even a fiduciary duty – to incorporate ESG considerations when making investment decisions.
Greater transparency in this area, through a sustainable finance disclosure regime, would reduce the risk of greenwashing. This would allow investors and asset managers to make better investment decisions.