The HKSAR Government has recently put forward its proposals on (1) enhancing the existing tax concessions for maritime services industry and (2) introducing a half-rate tax concessionary regime for physical commodity trading business in the Hong Kong SAR (Hong Kong) to the Legislative Council.
In this tax alert, we summarise the key features of the government’s proposals and share our observations.
As mentioned in the 2024 Policy Address1 and the 2025/26 Budget Speech2, the HKSAR Government is planning to (1) enhance the tax concessionary measures for the maritime services industry and (2) introduce a half-rate tax concessionary regime for commodity trading business in Hong Kong. On 8 July 2025, the government presented a briefing paper3 to the Legislative Council outlining its major recommendations on the above two tax concessions.
The existing tax concessionary regime for maritime services industry provides (1) a 0% concessionary tax rate for qualifying ship lessors, (2) a 0% or 8.25% concessionary tax rate for qualifying ship leasing managers and (3) a tax exemption or a concessionary tax rate of 0% or 8.25% for shipping commercial principals (i.e. ship agents, ship managers and ship brokers).
To further strengthen Hong Kong’s position as a leading international maritime centre and maintain the competitiveness of the existing tax concessions after the implementation of the global minimum tax (GMT) and Hong Kong domestic minimum top-up tax (HKMTT) under BEPS Pillar 2 in Hong Kong, the government has proposed the below refinements to the existing tax concessions.
The government recommends introducing a 15% concessionary tax rate as an additional option for qualifying ship lessors, ship leasing managers and shipping commercial principals of an in-scope MNE group under BEPS Pillar 2. Such entities can elect their preferred tax rate on an annual basis. There would be measures to deal with offsetting assessable profits with tax losses carried forward in situations where a taxpayer elects for different concessionary tax rates (e.g. 8.25% vs 15%) for its maritime services income across different years of assessment.
Entities electing for the 15% rate would be subject to a reduced substantial activity requirement as set out in the table below.
Under the current regime, qualifying ship lessors under operating lease are not entitled to any tax deduction for the ship acquisition costs. Instead, a “20% tax base concession” applies whereby the assessable profits are calculated based on 20% of the lease income. For Hong Kong profits tax (under Part 4 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance) purposes, this does not have any actual impact given the applicable tax rate is 0%. However, with the implementation of BEPS Pillar 2, such computation basis will drag down the effective date rate for Hong Kong for GMT and HKMTT purposes and may result in top-up tax being imposed for in-scope MNE groups.
The government therefore recommends introducing a tax deduction of ship acquisition costs in lieu of applying the 20% tax base concession for qualifying ship lessors under operating lease. The proposed tax deduction applies to ships acquired before or after the effective date of the legislative amendments. For ships which have been acquired and used prior to the effective date of the legislative amendments, the tax deduction amount will be adjusted.
Upon disposal of a ship of which a tax deduction has been granted, the sale proceeds of the ship (capped at the total amount of deduction allowed) will be deemed as taxable trading receipts for calculating the assessable profits in the disposal year.
Under the existing stringent interest expense deduction rules, interest expenses incurred by qualifying ship lessors for financing ship acquisition may not be deductible at all (e.g. for borrowings from an overseas associated company that is not a financial institution). The government recommends expanding the scope of tax deduction on interest expenses incurred for acquiring a ship to interest expenses on borrowings from:
We welcome the proposed enhancements of the existing tax concessions for the maritime services industry. The proposed changes in (2) and (3) above will help mitigate the top-up tax impact and reduce the compliance burden under BEPS Pillar 2 for in-scope MNE groups. This is particularly helpful when the international shipping income exclusion under the GloBE rules is not applicable.
A few proposed enhancements mentioned above mirror those made to the aircraft leasing tax concessionary regime that apply from year of assessment 2023/244. It has yet to be seen whether the optional 15% concessionary tax rate will also be made available under the aircraft leasing tax regime to provide similar flexibility to Pillar 2 in-scope aircraft leasing groups.
We recommend that the government takes the opportunity of the current review of the concessionary tax regime for the maritime services industry to consider other enhancements of the regime – e.g. (i) expanding the scope of the regime to cover container leasing, freight forwarding and logistics businesses and (ii) relaxing the requirement that actual corporate income tax must be paid by the overseas associated financier on the interest income for the Hong Kong taxpayer to claim a tax deduction on the interest expenses incurred on the borrowings from that overseas associated financier. Currently, this requirement cannot be met when the interest income is offset by a tax loss, resulting in no tax being paid by the overseas associated financier.
To attract more physical commodity traders to conduct their businesses in Hong Kong so as to drive the demand for high value-added maritime services in Hong Kong, the government has proposed to provide a half-rate tax concession for assessable profits derived from physical commodity trading business, subject to fulfilment of the specified conditions. We summarise below the key features of the proposed tax concession.
Assessable profits (including incidental income such as interest income, exchange gains and hedging gains) derived by a qualifying physical commodity trader (qualifying trader) from qualifying physical commodity trading activity will be taxed at an 8.25% tax rate. In addition, there is an option for a qualifying trader belonging to a Pillar 2 in-scope MNE group to make an annual election to be taxed at a 15% tax rate.
Three broad categories of physical commodities are covered, namely (1) energy and industrial commodities, (2) agricultural commodities and (3) metal mine commodities. The full list of qualifying physical commodity items is set out in the Appendix to Annex II of the briefing paper3.
Qualifying physical commodity trading activity refers to an activity of buying and/or selling of a qualifying physical commodity item that results in the physical delivery of the item5 and that fulfils the following requirements:
An entity is regarded as a qualifying physical commodity trader if it fulfils one of the following conditions:
The tax concession will only apply if:
The total annual income derived from qualifying physical commodity trading activity must be not less than HK$700 million.
For expenditure incurred by a qualifying trader on specified maritime services6, there is a requirement that at least:
must be incurred on services provided by “Hong Kong-based service providers” (i.e. persons whose business is registered in accordance with the Business Registration Ordinance).
The proposed tax concessionary regime for physical commodity trading business in Hong Kong represents another step taken by the HKSAR Government toward extending Hong Kong’s tax incentives to sectors beyond financial services.
Currently, Singapore also offers a tax incentive for commodity trading businesses in Singapore under the Global Trader Programme7 (GTP). The GTP applies to a wide range of commodity trading activities (including physical trading, derivative trading and structured commodity financing activities) and offers a preferential tax rate as low as 5%. While there are differences in the scope and tax rate offered under the Hong Kong and Singapore regimes, taxpayers should be mindful that the qualifying requirements, the degree of certainty and compliance burden may also be different under the two regimes.
To ensure the proposed tax concessionary regime in Hong Kong serves its policy objective, the government needs to continuously monitor its usage, solicit feedback from the industry and consider making any necessary enhancements. Although the major policy objective of the proposed concession is to bolster the development of the maritime services sector and therefore the current scope of the concession only covers physical commodity trading, we urge the government to consider, as the next step, expanding the scope of the concession to cover derivative trading and other financing activities related to commodity trading to nurture a more sustainable development of the commodity trading ecosystem in Hong Kong.
In addition, to strengthen the overall competitiveness of Hong Kong’s tax system as a whole, we recommend that the government looks into the other aspects of the Hong Kong tax system where refinements may be warranted. An example is the existing stringent interest expense deduction rules in Hong Kong which may pose challenges for overseas business groups seeking to conduct their businesses in Hong Kong.
The government plans to introduce a bill with the necessary legislative amendments to the Legislative Council in the first half of 2026. Upon the completion of the legislative process, both of the proposals for maritime services industry and physical commodity trading will take effect from the year of assessment 2025/26.
1 The 2024 Policy Address can be accessed via this link: https://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/2024/en/policy.html
2 The 2025/26 Budget Speech can be accessed via this link: https://www.budget.gov.hk/2025/eng/index.html
3 The briefing paper presented at the meeting of the Legislative Council’s Panel on Economic Development held on 8 July 2025 can be accessed via this link: https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2025/english/panels/edev/papers/edev20250708cb3-1045-5-e.pdf
4 For details, please refer to our previously issued Hong Kong SAR Tax Alert - Issue 25, December 2023.
5 Please refer to Annex II of the briefing paper for a list of actions constituting such activity.
6 Specified maritime services mean any services in connection with the activities of ship leasing, ship leasing management, ship agency, ship management and ship broking as well as freight booking, ship repairing, ship tug-and-row, maritime legal services and marine insurance.
7 For details, please refer to the website of the Enterprise Singapore via this link: https://www.enterprisesg.gov.sg/financial-support/global-trader-programme
Hong Kong SAR Tax Alert - Issue 5, July 2025
