The Tartu Circuit Court recently annulled a decision of the Tartu Administrative Court, which had upheld the position of the Tax and Customs Board (MTA) that a company was entitled to reduce its labour tax liability on the basis of a corrected income and social tax return (form TSD) submitted after the tax assessment had already been issued. The tax liability concerned a payment of 25,000 euros made in 2020 by the company to a member of its management board. In its tax assessment dated 28 October 2021, the MTA had classified this payment as remuneration paid to a member of the management board. In January 2022, the company submitted a revised TSD form reducing the labour tax liability on this payment. It argued that this was not remuneration paid to the member of the management board, but funds temporarily issued to the board member, which had already been repaid to the company in June 2021.
The Harju County Court agreed with the company’s position, finding that if the recipient of a payment subject to labour taxes repays the amount received in a previous tax period, the payer is entitled to file a TSD return adjusting the corresponding tax liability.
The Circuit Court, however, disagreed with the Administrative Court. According to the Circuit Court, the decisive factor was not the nature of the payment or the lawfulness of the MTA’s 2021 tax assessment, but the fact that by 2021 the company had effectively accepted the tax assessment as final and that the payment made to the board member was subject to labour taxes. The Circuit Court held that, by the time the revised return was submitted, the deadline for contesting the tax assessment had expired. The company should have provided its explanation and, if necessary, supporting evidence during the tax proceedings to demonstrate that the payment made to the board member in April 2020 had been returned in June 2021. As in this case the tax assessment had become final, the company was obliged to accept the resulting tax liability, having failed to exercise its legal remedies.
The Circuit Court did not rule on whether the repayment of a board member’s remuneration is, in principle, possible and permissible, as this had no bearing on the outcome of the case. Accordingly, the Circuit Court annulled the Administrative Court’s decision and dismissed the company’s application for a reduction of the tax liability.