For investment managers with a predictable ‘adjusted income’ above £360,000 (e.g. for employees their base salary and bonus, and for members of limited liability partnerships their profit share), the prospective taxation of carried interest as trading profits will not affect their annual allowance, which in any event will already be tapered down to the minimum £10,000.
However, for other individuals, the extent to which their annual allowance might taper down could be difficult to determine until after the end of the tax year due to the potential variability of carried interest receipts which, from 6 April 2026, will be treated as trading profits (and so be included in the calculation of ‘threshold income’ and ‘adjusted income’ for annual allowance tapering purposes).
This means that an amount of carried interest might arise which reduces an individual’s annual allowance after pension contributions made in that year have already exceeded that reduced allowance.
Individuals in those circumstances could be exposed to unexpected annual allowance charges of up to £22,500 (or up to £24,000 for Scottish taxpayers) based on current income tax rates. As time passes, these charges could be even higher as the new carried interest rules reduce any unused annual allowance available to ‘carry forward’ into subsequent tax years to offset against higher contributions. It is important to note that future tax charges on the eventual distributions from the pension scheme will not be reduced to reflect any annual allowance charges imposed on the original contributions. This ‘double tax’ situation could result in effective total tax charges of up to 90 percent (or up to 96 percent for Scottish taxpayers) based on current rates.
It’s also important to bear in mind that ‘investment management services’ are broadly defined by the draft legislation and include incidental or ancillary services. HMRC interpret ‘investment management services’ very widely for the purposes of the current carried interest regime, and state in their published guidance that where an individual works in a business and receives carried interest, this is compelling evidence that the individual performs investment management services.
The potential implications for individuals’ pension savings annual allowances of carried interest being brought wholly within the income tax regime is therefore also relevant to all individuals working for investment houses (including support function professionals) in receipt of carry.