The legislation will introduce joint and several liability for umbrella companies’ PAYE obligations (with separate legislation dealing with NIC) for ‘relevant parties’. For these purposes, ‘relevant parties’ are:
- The recruitment agency that contracts directly with the end client; and
- The end client if it contracts directly with either a non-UK resident agency, an agency that’s connected with the umbrella company, or the umbrella company.
But if neither the end client nor the agency that contracts directly with it are UK resident, the UK resident recruitment agency that is closest to the end client in the labour supply chain (if any) will be a ‘relevant party’. This means that both the umbrella company and the applicable relevant parties are equally liable to settle any applicable PAYE (and NIC and Apprenticeship Levy).
It does not matter which party pays, or how much each party pays, as long as the amount is paid in full. However, HMRC have indicated that they will approach the agency / end client in the first instance, rather than the umbrella company, to recover any underpayment of PAYE.
For end clients who are a ‘relevant party’, the liability is limited to payments that relate to the worker’s employment with reference to work for that specific end client.
It is worth noting that under the new legislation there is no right of appeal or defence against the liability for the relevant party – for example reasonable excuse or the provision of fraudulent information. End clients and agencies will therefore need to take robust and effective steps to secure the labour supply chain to manage the risk of a liability crystallising. Given that it will not always be immediately apparent for end clients whether they are a ‘relevant party’, and therefore jointly and severally liable, end clients will need to proactively confirm the nature of their labour supply chains to determine their risks and manage these appropriately.
The legislation also contains anti-avoidance provisions intended to prevent non-compliance through the use of artificial structures involving ‘purported umbrella companies’. These have been expanded since the legislation was published in draft and will apply in situations where the worker is not actually employed by the umbrella company, but it appears to one or more participants in the arrangements that they were the employer.