Skip to main content

      Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) can speed up processes, support data analyses and prepare decisions. However, the prerequisite for this is that the content generated is correct. This study explains how insurance companies can objectively measure, improve and successfully utilise the quality of AI products.

      To this end, over 200 texts generated by GenAI were compared with those of human experts. They then assessed how accurately the models work in areas such as actuarial services, accounting and Risk management. The results obtained can also be transferred to banks, asset managers and other knowledge-intensive sectors.

      Two key findings at a glance:

      • Precision does not happen by itself

        Simple commands are not enough. Only with structured prompt engineering and meta-prompting does the accuracy increase from 57 to 98 per cent compared to simple prompting. If you are strictly dependent on correct content, you should create prompt databases and proceed methodically.

      • RAG changes the rules of the game

        Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) brings internal knowledge into the AI process. This makes results more specific and factually accurate. A basic prerequisite for using AI in critical business processes.

      In the study, you will learn how you can systematically evaluate and utilise generative AI - not as an experiment, but as a component of digital excellence.

      mark_email_read

      Well informed about current important topics in the insurance industry.

      Evaluation of generative AI

      Insurance companies as an example

      Neuronen-Netz

      Weitere interessante Inhalte für Sie

      Your contact

      Dr. Fabian Bohnert

      Director, Financial Services - Insurance

      KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft