The past decade has also seen CEOs renewing their commitment to ESG and sustainability as a source of value creation. In 2015, CEOs ranked environmental risk as their least concerning priority risk; fast-forward to 2024 and almost a quarter (24 percent) acknowledged that the principal downside of failing to meet ESG expectations would be giving their competitors an edge, coming out ahead of threat to their own tenure (21 percent) and recruitment challenges (16 percent).
Moreover, despite the increasing politicization of the ESG agenda in some countries, leaders are particularly sensitive to the impact ESG issues can have on trust and the reputation of their organization. Three quarters (76 percent) of CEOs said they would be willing to divest a profitable part of the business that was damaging reputation, while 68 percent of CEOs say they would take a stance on a politically or socially contentious issue, even if the Board raised concerns with them doing so.
However, well over half (66 percent) of CEOs admit they are not prepared to withstand the potential scrutiny and expectations of stakeholders, as well as shareholders, when it comes to ESG, suggesting they will take action to mitigate this. In response to growing stakeholder and external pressures, CEOs also appear to be shifting in how they communicate their ESG efforts. In this year’s global survey, 69 percent of CEOs revealed that while they’ve retained the same climate related strategies over the last 12 months, they’ve adapted the language and terminology they use to meet changing stakeholder needs.
Tellingly, as we head into 2025, when many organizations will be reporting on environmental targets, 30 percent say the greatest barrier to achieving their climate ambitions is the complexity presented by the decarbonization of their supply chain – an issue further compounded by current geopolitical tensions around the world and activities impacting major global trade routes.