Omnibus initiative: The Omnibus “stop the clock” Directive has been published in the OJEU. The measures will delay second and third wave sustainability reporting under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) by two years, and due diligence requirements under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) by one year to July 2028 at the earliest. The Directive came into force on 17 April 2025 and Member States must transpose it into national law by 31 December 2025. Further omnibus proposals on reducing the scope of, and simplifying, sustainability reporting are still being considered.
ESRS simplification: The European Commission has moved the deadline for when it expects EFRAG to deliver its technical advice on the simplification of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) from 31 October to 30 November 2025. The public consultation on the revised ESRS will now run from the end of July to the end of September.
EU Taxonomy simplification: the European Commission has adopted a series of measures to simplify application of the EU Taxonomy. Under the Delegated Act, FS firms subject to sustainability reporting are exempt from assessing Taxonomy eligibility and alignment of their financial assets if these account for less than 10% of loans and investments financing specific economic activities whose use of proceeds is known. Additionally, banks have the option not to report against certain KPIs if the financial activities and assets captured by those KPIs generate less than 10% of the net turnover. The measures will apply as of 1 January 2026 and will cover FY2025 – however, there is an option for firms to apply the measures starting in FY2026 if this is more convenient.
ESG stress testing: The European Supervisory Authorities – ESAs – (the EBA, EIOPA and ESMA) are consulting until 19 September on draft Joint Guidelines on ESG stress testing, as mandated under the Capital Requirements and Solvency II Directives. The Guidelines set out how competent authorities for the banking and insurance sectors should integrate ESG risks when performing supervisory stress tests. They aim to harmonize methodologies and practices among supervisors in banking and insurance, to ensure proportionality and to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of ESG stress testing. The final Joint Guidelines are expected to be published by 10 January 2026.
Pillar 3 disclosure requirements: In line with the EC’s Omnibus initiative to reduce reporting burdens and simplify sustainability disclosures, the EBA is consulting until 22 August on amendments to Pillar 3 ESG disclosure requirements, proposing a new approach based on a firm's type, size and complexity. This approach is consistent with the ESG disclosure requirements set out in CRR3 and all banks in scope of the CRR will now be subject to the ESG disclosure requirements - not just large banks as previously. The consultation papers also include new templates and amendments to disclosures relating to shadow banking entities, equity exposures and non-performing and forborne exposures. The EBA will submit the final ITS to the EC in Q4 2025.
Product oversight and greenwashing: The EBA is consulting until 9 October on product oversight and governance guidelines for retail banking products, focusing on ESG features and greenwashing risks. The proposals aim to clarify requirements for products with ESG features to prevent consumer detriment without imposing additional regulatory burdens on firms. The final guidelines are expected in Q1 2026 and will apply from 1 December 2026.
EBA climate-related risk dashboard: The EBA has launched an ESG dashboard to monitor climate-related risks across the EU/EEA banking sector. Using data from banks' Pillar 3 ESG disclosures, the dashboard provides comparable indicators for both transition and physical climate risks. Initial data on the dashboard reveals significant exposure (over 70% in most countries) to companies in high-emission sectors, suggesting substantial transition risk.
ESG rating activities: ESMA has consulted on draft RTS on the transparency and integrity of ESG rating activities. The consultations covered information to be submitted as part of an application for authorisation or recognition, measures and safeguards for separation of activities, and disclosure requirements. ESMA will submit revised standards to the EC in October 2025.
Biodiversity risks for insurers: EIOPA has published a report on how insurers are identifying, measuring and managing biodiversity risks. Despite the challenges in assessing these risks due to their complexity and interconnectedness with other environmental risk factors, EIOPA’s notes promising market practices among insurers. It also points to areas where further engagement will be essential to strengthen the industry’s ability to respond to biodiversity-related risks going forward.
Call for Evidence on SFDR: The EC has sought evidence to inform its Q4 2025 review of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). It aims to improve the functioning of the SFDR by clarifying the framework for firms and end-investors and reducing the burden of reporting by simplifying and streamlining the requirements. The review will also consider wider proposed changes to reporting obligations under the CSRD and EU Taxonomy.
Review of asset managers’ compliance with ESG requirements: ESMA has completed its Common Supervisory Action (CSA) with EU regulators that examined asset managers’ compliance with two sets of regulations – UCITS and AIFMD requirements on the integration of sustainability risks, introduced in 2022, and the SFDR framework. Findings include good practice, below average practice and non-compliance.
- UCITS and AIFMD requirements – despite identifying some breaches to be addressed, ESMA found that asset managers’ compliance was satisfactory overall, with most firms’ boards and committees taking steps to discuss sustainability matters and the integration of sustainability risks.
- SFDR framework – ESMA found significant room for improvement across entity- and product-level disclosures, referring to inconsistencies, vague language and missing or inadequate detail. It notes that any changes coming out of the SFDR review will not be applicable soon – in the meantime, regulators should continue with vigilant supervision of the current rules.
Sustainability-related communications: ESMA has published a note on good and poor practice regarding sustainability-related claims made by firms. No new requirements are introduced, but ESMA sets out four principles for firms to follow, aligned to previous publications from the EBA and EIOPA – that claims should be “accurate”, “accessible”, “substantiated” and “up to date”. Aspects of these principles resemble the FCA’s “four Cs”, set out in FG 24/3. In addition to these general expectations, the note provides ‘dos’ and ‘don’ts’ in relation to ESG credentials, industry initiatives, labels and awards and peer comparisons.