October 2024
Measuring the impact of regulatory and supervisory activity
The KPMG Regulatory Barometer helps firms identify the key areas of pressure across the evolving UK and EU regulatory landscape.
Financial Services firms need to handle frequent regulatory updates from multiple sources and it can be difficult to distil the impacts of regulatory change and supervisory actions into a single view.
Ongoing geopolitical tensions, uncertain economic conditions, changing customer demands and behaviours, sustainability concerns and use of new technologies are all influencing regulatory agendas.
The Barometer:
- Delivers a consolidated source of regulatory intelligence.
- Assesses the extent of regulatory pressure across key themes.
- Provides a single metric to represent the size and complexity of the challenge.
A regulatory impact score is calculated for each of the Barometer key themes based on attributes such as volume of regulatory updates, materiality, time to implementation and supervisory intensity. The theme scores feed into a single overarching metric that represents the overall level of regulatory pressure.
Quantifying regulatory pressure
Welcome to the latest edition of the KPMG Regulatory Barometer – measuring the impact of regulatory and supervisory activity.
The aggregate regulatory pressure score for this edition of the Barometer is 7.3. Access the full report here.
KPMG Regulatory Barometer - H2 2024
Insights for the changing world
Key messages
Political changes in the last six months have resulted in some regulatory policy activity being put on hold. Competitiveness and growth are expected to be key areas of government focus in both the EU & UK, eventually having a regulatory impact.
- Financial Resilience retains the top spot and is now joined by Operational Resilience. Both reflect a refocusing on critical processes, operations and metrics in the wake of market events and score highly in terms of both policy pressure and supervisory intensity. Finalisation of significant policy initiatives and approaching implementation deadlines are contributing factors.
- ESG and Sustainable Finance remains very high on the regulatory agenda, but there has been a small drop in score. We attribute this to a slowing in publication of new policy, either due to election quiet periods or pending the outcome of reviews in progress. It is possible that the score will tick back up in the next 6 to 12 months. Supervisory intensity is also likely to pick up on the back of the FCA's AGR and implementation of the CSRD and other reporting requirements and associated assurance requirements.
- Renewed policy interest in how financial services firms and the capital markets can contribute to the growth agenda is influencing regulatory pressure. Policymakers are considering ways to drive investment to the domestic economy – including into infrastructure and unlisted assets.
- There has been a resurgence in pressure around Customer Protection. This has been heavily influenced by the volume, proactivity and targeted nature of supervisory attention that UK’s FCA is dedicating to Consumer Duty.
- The score for Digital Finance has increased but not enough to challenge Customer Protection. Digital remains an area where there is a lot of noise in the market, but less in terms of concrete policy and specific actions required from Financial Services firms.
- The score for Accessing Markets has fallen, once more, as post-Brexit policy and supervisory measures increasingly transition to business as usual activity.
Theme overviews
EU and UK regulation – alignment or divergence?
Post-Brexit, the EU and UK are now following their own policymaking agendas. However, fundamental regulatory concerns continue to be shared and the first Joint EU-UK Financial Regulatory Forum has established the framework for ongoing discussion and collaboration.
Divergence of policy detail and timing increases complexity for cross-border firms. The UK has begun to tailor rules to a more UK-centric and principles-based style of rulemaking, while the EU has its own complex legislative agenda for financial services. Both jurisdictions are considering the impact of regulation on competitiveness.
As part of the Edinburgh Reforms, HMT is moving forward with the repealing and reforming of 43 ‘core files’ of retained EU law in a way that is ‘thoughtfully planned and sequenced to minimise unnecessary disruption while taking the opportunity to maximise the potential for the greatest economic impact’. The Treasury Select Committee reported that progress has been too slow, to which the government responded by asserting that the current plans allow an appropriate amount of time for consultation and implementation.
EU and UK regulatory requirements align to different extents across the nine Barometer themes – in some cases reflecting different starting points due to previous UK and EU Member State ‘gold-plating’ and national rules.
Related content
Contact us
- Philip Deeks
- Alisa Dolgova
- Michelle Adcock
- David Collington
- Kate Dawson